EQ與平庸

我記得在我進心理學系那年，EQ剛開始大紅，而系中教授頗認為是庸俗的偽學術。在單線條生物那邊看到這個eq 分數test。

Your EQ is

93 50 or less: Thanks for answering honestly. Now get yourself a shrink, quick! 51-70: When it comes to understanding human emotions, you'd have better luck understanding Chinese. 71-90: You've got more emotional intelligence than the average frat boy. Barely. 91-110: You're average. It's easy to predict how you'll react to things. But anyone could have guessed that. 111-130: You usually have it going on emotionally, but roadblocks tend to land you on your butt. 131-150: You are remarkable when it comes to relating with others. Only the biggest losers get under your skin. 150+: Two possibilities - you've either out "Dr. Phil-ed" Dr. Phil... or you're a dirty liar.

What's Your EQ (Emotional Intelligence Quotient)?

91-110: You're average. It's easy to predict how you'll react to things. But anyone could have guessed that. 我覺得自己徹底摧毀了這個test。（看來我只會敗給隨機！）對於「極端」來說，eq極高或極低都並不對立，最絕的是，avesrage。於是你可以明白，為什麼這個blog的介紹是「傾向極端」，而不是極端；也明白鄙人在各處一再聲稱的，鄙人實是個蒼白平板的人這件事，實在是事實及事實之全部。所有覺得鄙人極端、難以控制難以預測的朋友，尤其那班煞有介事妖言惑眾壞我大事推我去死的好事之徒，唔該在科學的面前收皮、誠心改邪歸正，承認鄙人的mediorcrity，以後站到我這一方來。